In This Issue
Nanotechnology as a Key Technology Tool for Addressing the Unholy
Trinity
Looking to 2019: Economics & Values in the Reform of the U.S. Health
System
IAF Speaks to the Future at WorldFuture
2008
Forward
Perspectives
Nanotechnology as a Key Technology Tool for Addressing the Unholy
Trinity
By IAF President Jonathan Peck
Nanotechnology will be a critical component for technological solutions to a potential "unholy trinity" scenario. The "unholy trinity" is a worst
case scenario where three global problems occur at the same time to create widespread disruption to environmental, political and economic systems.
IAF
first described the "unholy trinity" scenario in our March
2008
Newsletter.
The earth's population will quickly grow to seven, eight and eventually nine billion people this century. Developing a 21st century infrastructure
that harnesses the power of nanotechnology will be vital to
address the three interlinked challenges of the "unholy trinity":
- The challenge of peak oil will force us to alter the way we use
energy for power generation, transmission and transportation. The choice will be regression to a simpler, older way of life that uses less energy or
accelerated research into ways to conserve energy and improve the efficiency of alternatives to oil and coal.
- The second unholy problem comes when our use of oil and coal accelerates the
climate change that has already started. Global warming
will spark widespread environmental problems including water shortages in the American West, flooding due to melting ice caps in India, severe
drought
cycles in Africa and widespread disruption in Europe due to international migration.
- The third problem in "the unholy trinity" is a global economic
downturn that pulls people everywhere into a cycle of stagnation and inflation that lands us somewhere between recession and
depression.
The cost of energy surging makes food and travel ever more expensive, and more businesses see costs rise and sales fall which leads them to cut
their
workforce.
Nanotechnology will help address
the challenges of peak oil by improving energy efficiency and forming vital components of sustainable energy technology. Nano-structure materials
will
be vital to improving the efficiency of lighting, heating, electricity conduction and electricity storage. Lighter and more durable materials based
on
nanotechnology will improve the efficiency of many common devices. For example, lighter, stronger nanomaterials can be used to reduce the weight, and
ultimately improve the fuel efficiency of cars, planes, trains and other vehicles. Nanotechnology is also a vital component for more efficient
batteries & wiring, the polymer membranes of fuel cells and hydrogen storage devices. These are key technologies for storing, using and
transmitting the intermittent power produced by sustainable energy. Nanotechnology is also being used in the development of less expensive, more efficient thin film solar cells and nanotechnology coatings to improve the efficiency of silicon solar
cells. Stronger,
lighter, and more conductive materials based on nanotechnology will also improve other sustainable energy sources such as wind turbines, tidal power
stations, geothermal power plants, and biomass gasification.
Nanotechnology offers a number of solutions to the water problems caused by population growth and
global warming. Many of the regions that will experience the most growth, such as the Middle East,
Africa and India, are already under acute water stress. Twenty-nine countries were estimated to be experiencing water stress in 1995, and the World
Bank
projects that by 2025, about forty-eight countries will experience water stress. Global warming will exacerbate water shortages by making weather
cycles more extreme leading to more volatile drought cycles. Nanotechnology offers potential solutions through inexpensive water purification and
desalinization using microfiltration systems. Nanotechnology could also be a part of water conservation strategies needed to support new forms of
farming that could avert massive famines.
Paradoxically, nanotechnology's role in addressing the first two challenges of the "unholy trinity"
could be the basis for addressing the third challenge of a global economic downturn. Economic expansions tend to be linked to the explosion of new
technologies that fill vital needs and transform economic systems. Nanotechnology has the potential to foster high growth across many other sectors
of the economy. Like the IT revolution in decades
past, a nanotech revolution changes so many basic industries that it opens prospects for another economic boom.
The impetus for thinking about nanotechnology as a solution to the "unholy trinity" occurred after a recent workshop I facilitated for the National Nanotechnology Initiative (NNI). The NNI is the U.S. research program for
nanotechnology. Unlike most government programs, the NNI crosses 25 different federal agencies to leverage nanotechnology's unique benefits across
vast swathes of our society. The workshop facilitation experience was unique as it brought together leaders
from across the federal government united in a shared vision for nanotechnology's future.
It is this shared vision that made me think of nanotechnology as a way to address another
fundamental problem. In IAF's work with the government,
we've noticed departments and agencies succumb to "hollow government syndrome". The phrase "hollow government syndrome" refers to the phenomenon of
government agencies facing problems that grow in scope and scale while the capacity of the government stagnates or diminishes. The fundamental
organization of government in departments and agencies (funded and overseen by congressional committees) creates segmented responses to large
problems
needing integrated solutions. The NNI's integrated approach to fostering nanotechnology may be an example of how to make government work outside the
"stovepipes" and "silos" that fail to support collaboration for innovation.
It is early days for this initiative, and it is clearly counter-cultural for those people who are
used to bureaucratic turf wars, but it offers hope.
Maybe the NNI will show how government can rise to the challenge of solving our most vexing problems by demonstrating how to take advantage of the
most promising technological revolution since the computer.
Trends &
Insights
Looking to 2019: Economics & Values in the Reform of the U.S. Health
System
Early in the month of July, the United States Senate was deep in negotiations over planned cuts to doctor payments under Medicare. The impasse
finally broke on Wednesday when Senator Ted Kennedy returned to the Capitol from treatment for brain cancer to thunderous applause to break a
Republican filibuster. The passions evoked on both sides of the aisle during the impasse showed both the importance of fixing out healthcare system
and the challenge of finding common ground.
Healthcare has been a key part of the campaigns of both Barrack Obama and John McCain. Obama campaigned during the Democratic primary on a universal,
portable healthcare coverage through a national plan that requires companies to pay for coverage or contribute to a public fund. The system would
look
much more like Medicare than our current system.
McCain, on the other hand, also wants universal coverage, but would get there by reforming the healthcare marketplace, taxing employee sponsored
benefits and using the proceeds to fund tax credits for individuals and families to buy insurance coverage. Rather than making the national system
more like Medicare and Medicaid, McCain would make those systems more like the current national system by successfully reforming the "spending pressures in
Social Security,
Medicare, and Medicaid." The Republican approach would rely more on privatization and competition in the marketplace to reduce costs, improve
care
and achieve universal coverage.
The American system is notoriously inefficient. Americans pay more per capita for healthcare than any other nation on Earth, yet by every objective
measure available, this spending has not correlated with better health outcomes. For example, the U.S. spent forty‐four percent more per capita than
Switzerland, the
nation with the next highest per person healthcare costs. Yet, for this price Americans received, on average, fewer physician visits and fewer days
in
hospital than their Swiss counterparts.
Both candidates agree that change is urgently needed. However, the differences in values between the two parties combined with vested interests have
stymied all previous attempts at reform. Part of the problem is that we, as a nation, have not consciously identified our healthcare values. Without
publically addressing what we value as a nation in our healthcare, the political arena remains open to political struggle over trade-offs that
benefits those with vested interests in preventing change.
Yet the ushering in of a new administration in 2009 brings with it a renewed hope for change in U.S.
healthcare. It is IAF's hope that by 2019, the
United States will have a better health system with universal coverage that both candidates support. But getting there will require discussion and
consensus not only on the dysfunctional economics of our current system, but also on the values that should drive healthcare in the U.S. With that in
mind, IAF has prepared briefs on values and economics for our project
2019: Healthcare that Works for All.
News and Events
IAF Speaks to the Future at WorldFuture
2008
The World Future Society's annual convention is fast approaching. On July 26th -28th, WorldFuture 2008 Seeing the World Through New Eyes will be held in
Washington D.C. IAF will
holding its regular Wiser Futures Workshop as well as a number of panel discussions.
IAF Futurists Marsha Rhea and Craig Bettles will join Elizabeth Carlson from the National
Association of Elementary School Principals (NAESP) to explore the future of education. The panel, 2021 Vision for Elementary and Middle
Schools
in a Global Society, will be held on July 28th, 2008. This panel will draw on the learning formed during NAESP's groundbreaking futures project
Vision 2021. Those attending the panel will not just learn about the
forecasts and
scenarios for the future of education developed by IAF, but will also have opportunities for interaction with their colleagues and to learn from
Elizabeth Carlson how a compelling future vision for the profession of education is transforming NAESP.
IAF Futurists Clem Bezold and Bill Rowley will discuss the exciting opportunities for the future of health care at the Health For All and a
Health
Care System Worth Creating panel on July 27th, 2008. The session will provide real insight into the future of the profession by drawing on the
extensive experience of Bezold and Rowley as well as the healthcare futures projects underway at IAF such as the 2019: Healthcare that Works for All
project. Bezold and
Rowley will also demonstrate the IAF model for a health care system worth creating in this session.
IAF Senior Associate Jay Herson and David Pearce Snyder of The Snyder Family Enterprise will tackle the future of air travel in The Coming Decade
in
Air Travel, 2020 Visions from Two Blind Seers on July 27th, 2008. Herson and Snyder will discuss air travel from the perspectives of a
technology
forecaster and a trend extrapolator. Through a dialogue with the audience, the two futurists will show how two dramatically different future visions
of air travel to create a complete picture of air travel in 2020.
IAF looks forward to meeting you at WorldFuture 2008 Seeing the World
Through
New Eyes. You can register for the conference and the IAF Wiser Futures Workshop online.
Upcoming
Events
A Bold New World 2008 AACP Annual Meeting and
Seminars,
IAF President Jonathan Peck, July 20th, Chicago, Illinois.
Wiser Futures Workshop, WorldFuture 2008: Seeing the Future Through New Eyes, IAF Futurists Clem Bezold, Marsha Rhea, Craig Bettles and Devin Fidler,
July
26th, Washington, DC.
Health For All and a Health Care System Worth Creating, WorldFuture 2008: Seeing the Future Through New Eyes, IAF Futurists Clem Bezold and Bill
Rowley, July 27th, Washington, DC.
Using Futures in Organizational Strategy, WorldFuture 2008: Seeing the Future Through New Eyes, IAF Futurists Jonathan Peck, Bill Rowley and Devin Fidler, July 27th,
Washington, DC.
The Coming Decade in Air Travel, 2020 Visions from Two Blind Seers, WorldFuture 2008: Seeing the Future Through New Eyes, IAF Senior
Associate Jay Herson with
David Pearce Synder, July 27th, Washington, DC.
2021 Vision for Elementary and Middle Schools in a Global Society, WorldFuture 2008: Seeing the Future Through New Eyes, IAF Futurists
Marsha Rhea and Craig
Bettles with Elizabeth Carlson, July 28th, Washington, DC.
Key Trends and Uncertainties, Views from Corporate Foresight, WorldFuture 2008: Seeing the Future Through New Eyes, IAF Founder and
Chairman of the Board
Clem Bezold with Klaus Heinzelbecker and Gereon Uerz, July 28th, Washington, DC.